Alternatives to MonoGame logo

Alternatives to MonoGame

libGDX, Xamarin, Godot, SDL, and JavaScript are the most popular alternatives and competitors to MonoGame.
33
52
+ 1
1

What is MonoGame and what are its top alternatives?

MonoGame is a popular open-source framework that enables developers to create cross-platform games with C#. It provides a high-level API for game development, supporting multiple platforms such as Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and more. MonoGame allows for code reusability and rapid development, making it a favorite among indie game developers. However, some limitations of MonoGame include its steep learning curve for beginners and the lack of built-in support for advanced features like physics engines.

  1. Unity: Unity is a powerful game development platform that offers a wide range of tools and features for creating 2D and 3D games. It provides a user-friendly interface, extensive documentation, and a large community of developers. Pros of Unity include cross-platform support, asset store for easy integration of assets, and built-in physics engine. Cons include a steep learning curve for beginners and a subscription-based pricing model.

  2. Godot Engine: Godot Engine is a free and open-source game engine that is easy to use and lightweight. It supports 2D and 3D game development, offers a visual editor, and has a dedicated scripting language (GDScript). Pros of Godot Engine include a strong community, cross-platform support, and a flexible node-based architecture. The cons include limited third-party libraries and plugins compared to other engines.

  3. Phaser: Phaser is a fast, flexible, and free HTML5 game framework that allows for easy development of mobile and desktop games. It provides a robust set of features for 2D game development, supports multiple platforms, and has excellent documentation. Pros of Phaser include a lightweight footprint, active community, and a variety of plugins and extensions. Cons include limited support for 3D game development and less intuitive user interface compared to other engines.

  4. Unreal Engine: Unreal Engine is a powerful game development platform known for its stunning graphics and advanced features. It supports both 2D and 3D game development, provides a visual scripting system (Blueprints), and has a robust set of tools for creating immersive experiences. Pros of Unreal Engine include high-quality visuals, advanced physics engine, and strong industry presence. Cons include a steep learning curve and royalty fees for commercial projects.

  5. GameMaker Studio: GameMaker Studio is a user-friendly game development platform that is ideal for beginners and indie developers. It offers drag-and-drop functionality, a scripting language (GML), and supports both 2D and limited 3D game development. Pros of GameMaker Studio include rapid prototyping, multi-platform support, and a large community. Cons include limitations on complex game mechanics and performance for high-end 3D games.

  6. Cocos2d-x: Cocos2d-x is a popular open-source game engine that is optimized for developing mobile games. It supports 2D game development, provides a rich set of features, and offers cross-platform compatibility. Pros of Cocos2d-x include rapid development, extensive documentation, and a large community. Cons include a steep learning curve for beginners and limited support for 3D game development compared to other engines.

  7. LÖVE: LÖVE is a lightweight framework for creating 2D games using the Lua scripting language. It is free, open-source, and easy to learn, making it a great choice for beginners and small projects. Pros of LÖVE include simplicity, fast development process, and active community. Cons include limited support for complex game mechanics and fewer built-in features compared to other engines.

  8. LibGDX: LibGDX is a cross-platform game development framework that focuses on performance and flexibility. It supports 2D and 3D game development, provides a Java-based API, and offers tools for efficient game creation. Pros of LibGDX include high performance, extensive documentation, and strong community support. Cons include a steeper learning curve for beginners and fewer visual editing tools compared to other engines.

  9. Defold: Defold is a collaborative game development platform that emphasizes ease of collaboration and efficiency. It supports 2D game development, provides a visual editor, and offers built-in support for live updates. Pros of Defold include cloud-based collaboration, rapid iteration process, and good performance optimization. Cons include limited support for larger-scale 3D projects and a smaller community compared to other engines.

  10. PICO-8: PICO-8 is a fantasy console for making, sharing, and playing tiny games and other computer programs. It has built-in code editor, music tracker and sprite designer for creating retro-style games. Pros of PICO-8 include simplicity, creative constraints for game developers, and easy sharing of games online through the platform. Cons include limited capabilities for larger, more complex game projects and lack of advanced features compared to other engines.

Top Alternatives to MonoGame

  • libGDX
    libGDX

    The framework provides an environment for rapid prototyping and fast iterations. Instead of deploying to Android/iOS/Javascript after each code change, you can run and debug your game on the desktop, natively. Desktop JVM features like code hotswapping reduce your iteration times considerably. ...

  • Xamarin
    Xamarin

    Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. ...

  • Godot
    Godot

    It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world. ...

  • SDL
    SDL

    It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • HTML5
    HTML5

    HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997. ...

MonoGame alternatives & related posts

libGDX logo

libGDX

46
3
A Java game development framework that provides a unified API that works across all supported platforms
46
3
PROS OF LIBGDX
  • 1
    Knows exactly what happening
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Fully control
CONS OF LIBGDX
  • 1
    Full access to OS
  • 1
    No GUI

related libGDX posts

Xamarin logo

Xamarin

1.3K
785
Create iOS, Android and Mac apps in C#
1.3K
785
PROS OF XAMARIN
  • 121
    Power of c# on mobile devices
  • 81
    Native performance
  • 79
    Native apps with native ui controls
  • 73
    No javascript - truely compiled code
  • 67
    Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms
  • 45
    Ability to leverage visual studio
  • 44
    Mvvm pattern
  • 44
    Many great c# libraries
  • 36
    Amazing support
  • 34
    Powerful platform for .net developers
  • 19
    GUI Native look and Feel
  • 16
    Nuget package manager
  • 12
    Free
  • 9
    Backed by Microsoft
  • 9
    Enables code reuse on server
  • 8
    Faster Development
  • 7
    Use of third-party .NET libraries
  • 7
    It's free since Apr 2016
  • 7
    Best performance than other cross-platform
  • 7
    Easy Debug and Trace
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 6
    Mac IDE (Xamarin Studio)
  • 6
    Xamarin.forms is the best, it's amazing
  • 5
    That just work for every scenario
  • 5
    C# mult paradigm language
  • 5
    Power of C#, no javascript, visual studio
  • 4
    Great docs
  • 4
    Compatible to develop Hybrid apps
  • 4
    Microsoft stack
  • 4
    Microsoft backed
  • 3
    Well Designed
  • 3
    Small learning curve for Mobile developers
  • 2
    Ionic
  • 2
    Ability to leverage legacy C and C++
CONS OF XAMARIN
  • 9
    Build times
  • 5
    Visual Studio
  • 4
    Price
  • 3
    Complexity
  • 3
    Scalability
  • 2
    Nuget
  • 2
    Maturity
  • 2
    Build Tools
  • 2
    Support
  • 0
    Maturidade
  • 0
    Performance

related Xamarin posts

Greg Neumann
Indie, Solo, Developer · | 8 upvotes · 1.6M views

Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

See more
Bhupendra Madhu
Web Developer at Ecombooks · | 8 upvotes · 725.5K views

I want to learn cross-platform application frameworks like React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, or Ionic, and I'm a web developer. I can learn other programming languages as well. But I'm confused about what to learn, which framework is best, and which framework will last long as the application grows further into complexity.

See more
Godot logo

Godot

221
47
Free and open source 2D and 3D game engine
221
47
PROS OF GODOT
  • 14
    Open source
  • 7
    Supports both C++, C# and GDScript
  • 7
    Cross-Platform
  • 7
    Easy to port
  • 5
    Simple
  • 4
    Avaible on Steam For Free
  • 3
    GDScript is Based On Python
CONS OF GODOT
  • 1
    Harder to learn
  • 1
    Performance in 3D
  • 1
    Need opengl 2.1 / 3.3
  • 1
    Somewhat poor 3D performance and lacks automatic LODs

related Godot posts

SDL logo

SDL

40
4
A cross-platform software development library
40
4
PROS OF SDL
  • 2
    Actively being worked on
  • 1
    Cross-platform
  • 1
    Fast
CONS OF SDL
  • 1
    No GUI support

related SDL posts

JavaScript logo

JavaScript

371.3K
8.1K
Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
371.3K
8.1K
PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
  • 1.7K
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1.5K
    It's everywhere
  • 1.2K
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 899
    Fast
  • 746
    Light weight
  • 425
    Flexible
  • 392
    You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
  • 286
    Non-blocking i/o
  • 237
    Ubiquitousness
  • 191
    Expressive
  • 55
    Extended functionality to web pages
  • 49
    Relatively easy language
  • 46
    Executed on the client side
  • 30
    Relatively fast to the end user
  • 25
    Pure Javascript
  • 21
    Functional programming
  • 15
    Async
  • 13
    Full-stack
  • 12
    Its everywhere
  • 12
    Future Language of The Web
  • 12
    Setup is easy
  • 11
    JavaScript is the New PHP
  • 11
    Because I love functions
  • 10
    Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
  • 9
    Everyone use it
  • 9
    Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
  • 9
    Easy
  • 9
    Expansive community
  • 8
    For the good parts
  • 8
    Easy to hire developers
  • 8
    No need to use PHP
  • 8
    Most Popular Language in the World
  • 8
    Powerful
  • 8
    Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
  • 7
    It's fun
  • 7
    Its fun and fast
  • 7
    Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
  • 7
    Agile, packages simple to use
  • 7
    Supports lambdas and closures
  • 7
    Love-hate relationship
  • 7
    Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
  • 7
    Evolution of C
  • 7
    Hard not to use
  • 7
    Versitile
  • 7
    Nice
  • 6
    Easy to make something
  • 6
    Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
  • 6
    1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 6
    Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
  • 6
    It let's me use Babel & Typescript
  • 5
    Clojurescript
  • 5
    Everywhere
  • 5
    Scope manipulation
  • 5
    Function expressions are useful for callbacks
  • 5
    Stockholm Syndrome
  • 5
    Promise relationship
  • 5
    Client processing
  • 5
    What to add
  • 4
    Because it is so simple and lightweight
  • 4
    Only Programming language on browser
  • 1
    Subskill #4
  • 1
    Test2
  • 1
    Easy to understand
  • 1
    Not the best
  • 1
    Easy to learn
  • 1
    Hard to learn
  • 1
    Easy to learn and test
  • 1
    Love it
  • 1
    Test
  • 0
    Hard 彤
CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
  • 22
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 15
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 9
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 8
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
  • 7
    Thinks strange results are better than errors
  • 6
    Can be ugly
  • 3
    No GitHub
  • 2
    Slow
  • 0
    HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

related JavaScript posts

Zach Holman

Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Python logo

Python

250.4K
6.9K
A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
250.4K
6.9K
PROS OF PYTHON
  • 1.2K
    Great libraries
  • 965
    Readable code
  • 848
    Beautiful code
  • 789
    Rapid development
  • 692
    Large community
  • 439
    Open source
  • 394
    Elegant
  • 283
    Great community
  • 274
    Object oriented
  • 222
    Dynamic typing
  • 78
    Great standard library
  • 62
    Very fast
  • 56
    Functional programming
  • 52
    Easy to learn
  • 47
    Scientific computing
  • 36
    Great documentation
  • 30
    Productivity
  • 29
    Matlab alternative
  • 29
    Easy to read
  • 25
    Simple is better than complex
  • 21
    It's the way I think
  • 20
    Imperative
  • 19
    Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 17
    Powerfull language
  • 17
    Machine learning support
  • 16
    Fast and simple
  • 14
    Scripting
  • 12
    Explicit is better than implicit
  • 11
    Ease of development
  • 10
    Clear and easy and powerfull
  • 9
    Unlimited power
  • 8
    It's lean and fun to code
  • 8
    Import antigravity
  • 7
    Print "life is short, use python"
  • 7
    Python has great libraries for data processing
  • 6
    Although practicality beats purity
  • 6
    Fast coding and good for competitions
  • 6
    There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
  • 6
    High Documented language
  • 6
    Readability counts
  • 6
    Rapid Prototyping
  • 6
    I love snakes
  • 6
    Now is better than never
  • 6
    Flat is better than nested
  • 6
    Great for tooling
  • 5
    Great for analytics
  • 5
    Web scraping
  • 5
    Lists, tuples, dictionaries
  • 4
    Complex is better than complicated
  • 4
    Socially engaged community
  • 4
    Plotting
  • 4
    Beautiful is better than ugly
  • 4
    Easy to learn and use
  • 4
    Easy to setup and run smooth
  • 4
    Simple and easy to learn
  • 4
    Multiple Inheritence
  • 4
    CG industry needs
  • 3
    List comprehensions
  • 3
    Powerful language for AI
  • 3
    Flexible and easy
  • 3
    It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
  • 3
    Many types of collections
  • 3
    If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
  • 3
    If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
  • 3
    Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
  • 3
    Pip install everything
  • 3
    No cruft
  • 3
    Generators
  • 3
    Import this
  • 2
    Can understand easily who are new to programming
  • 2
    Securit
  • 2
    Should START with this but not STICK with This
  • 2
    A-to-Z
  • 2
    Because of Netflix
  • 2
    Only one way to do it
  • 2
    Better outcome
  • 2
    Good for hacking
  • 2
    Batteries included
  • 2
    Procedural programming
  • 1
    Sexy af
  • 1
    Automation friendly
  • 1
    Slow
  • 1
    Best friend for NLP
  • 0
    Powerful
  • 0
    Keep it simple
  • 0
    Ni
CONS OF PYTHON
  • 53
    Still divided between python 2 and python 3
  • 28
    Performance impact
  • 26
    Poor syntax for anonymous functions
  • 22
    GIL
  • 19
    Package management is a mess
  • 14
    Too imperative-oriented
  • 12
    Hard to understand
  • 12
    Dynamic typing
  • 12
    Very slow
  • 8
    Indentations matter a lot
  • 8
    Not everything is expression
  • 7
    Incredibly slow
  • 7
    Explicit self parameter in methods
  • 6
    Requires C functions for dynamic modules
  • 6
    Poor DSL capabilities
  • 6
    No anonymous functions
  • 5
    Fake object-oriented programming
  • 5
    Threading
  • 5
    The "lisp style" whitespaces
  • 5
    Official documentation is unclear.
  • 5
    Hard to obfuscate
  • 5
    Circular import
  • 4
    Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
  • 4
    The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
  • 4
    Not suitable for autocomplete
  • 2
    Meta classes
  • 1
    Training wheels (forced indentation)

related Python posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Shared insights
on
TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

What do you think about TensorFlow?

Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

See more
Node.js logo

Node.js

193K
8.5K
A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
193K
8.5K
PROS OF NODE.JS
  • 1.4K
    Npm
  • 1.3K
    Javascript
  • 1.1K
    Great libraries
  • 1K
    High-performance
  • 805
    Open source
  • 487
    Great for apis
  • 477
    Asynchronous
  • 425
    Great community
  • 390
    Great for realtime apps
  • 296
    Great for command line utilities
  • 86
    Websockets
  • 84
    Node Modules
  • 69
    Uber Simple
  • 59
    Great modularity
  • 58
    Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
  • 42
    Easy to start
  • 35
    Great for Data Streaming
  • 32
    Realtime
  • 28
    Awesome
  • 25
    Non blocking IO
  • 18
    Can be used as a proxy
  • 17
    High performance, open source, scalable
  • 16
    Non-blocking and modular
  • 15
    Easy and Fun
  • 14
    Easy and powerful
  • 13
    Future of BackEnd
  • 13
    Same lang as AngularJS
  • 12
    Fullstack
  • 11
    Fast
  • 10
    Scalability
  • 10
    Cross platform
  • 9
    Simple
  • 8
    Mean Stack
  • 7
    Great for webapps
  • 7
    Easy concurrency
  • 6
    Typescript
  • 6
    Fast, simple code and async
  • 6
    React
  • 6
    Friendly
  • 5
    Control everything
  • 5
    Its amazingly fast and scalable
  • 5
    Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
  • 5
    Scalable
  • 5
    Great speed
  • 5
    Fast development
  • 4
    It's fast
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Isomorphic coolness
  • 3
    Great community
  • 3
    Not Python
  • 3
    Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
  • 3
    TypeScript Support
  • 3
    Blazing fast
  • 3
    Performant and fast prototyping
  • 3
    Easy to learn
  • 3
    Easy
  • 3
    Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
  • 3
    One language, end-to-end
  • 3
    Less boilerplate code
  • 2
    Npm i ape-updating
  • 2
    Event Driven
  • 2
    Lovely
  • 1
    Creat for apis
  • 0
    Node
CONS OF NODE.JS
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 45
    New framework every day
  • 40
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 33
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 24
    Callback
  • 19
    Javascript
  • 11
    Dependency hell
  • 11
    Dependency based on GitHub
  • 10
    Low computational power
  • 7
    Very very Slow
  • 7
    Can block whole server easily
  • 7
    Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
  • 4
    Breaking updates
  • 4
    Unstable
  • 3
    Unneeded over complication
  • 3
    No standard approach
  • 1
    Bad transitive dependency management
  • 1
    Can't read server session

related Node.js posts

Anurag Maurya

Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

Hello community,

I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

See more
Shared insights
on
Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

  1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

  2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

  3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

See more
HTML5 logo

HTML5

153.2K
2.2K
5th major revision of the core language of the World Wide Web
153.2K
2.2K
PROS OF HTML5
  • 448
    New doctype
  • 389
    Local storage
  • 334
    Canvas
  • 285
    Semantic header and footer
  • 240
    Video element
  • 121
    Geolocation
  • 106
    Form autofocus
  • 100
    Email inputs
  • 85
    Editable content
  • 79
    Application caches
  • 10
    Easy to use
  • 9
    Cleaner Code
  • 5
    Easy
  • 4
    Websockets
  • 4
    Semantical
  • 3
    Audio element
  • 3
    Content focused
  • 3
    Better
  • 3
    Modern
  • 2
    Compatible
  • 2
    Very easy to learning to HTML
  • 2
    Semantic Header and Footer, Geolocation, New Doctype
  • 2
    Portability
CONS OF HTML5
  • 2
    Easy to forget the tags when you're a begginner
  • 1
    Long and winding code

related HTML5 posts

Shared insights
on
MySQLMySQLPHPPHPJavaScriptJavaScriptHTML5HTML5

Hey guys, I need some advice on one thing. Currently, I am a fresher and know HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, PHP and, MySQL. Recently I got a client project through one of my friends and he wants me to build an E-learning Management System. Are these skills enough to build an LMS website?

Thanks in advance!! ;)

See more
Jan Vlnas
Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 26 upvotes · 482.1K views
Shared insights
on
HTML5HTML5JavaScriptJavaScriptNext.jsNext.js

Few years ago we were building a Next.js site with a few simple forms. This required handling forms validation and submission, but instead of picking some forms library, we went with plain JavaScript and constraint validation API in HTML5. This shaved off a few KBs of dependencies and gave us full control over the validation behavior and look. I describe this approach, with its pros and cons, in a blog post.

See more