RabbitMQ vs. Kafka vs. ActiveMQ

Get help choosing one of these Get news updates about these tools


Favorites

117

Favorites

109

Favorites

4

RabbitMQ vs Kafka vs ActiveMQ: What are the differences?

RabbitMQ, Kafka, and ActiveMQ are all messaging technologies used to provide asynchronous communication and decouple processes (detaching the sender and receiver of a message). They are called message queues, message brokers, or messaging tools. RabbitMQ, Kafka, and ActiveMQ all serve the same basic purpose, but can go about their jobs differently. Kafka is a high-throughput distributed messaging system. RabbitMQ is an AMQP based reliable message broker. ActiveMQ and Kafka are both Apache products, and both written in Java; RabbitMQ is written in Erlang.

Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • 402
  • 320
  • 8.77K
  • -
  • 27
  • 0
  • -
  • 46
  • 4.74K

GitHub Stats

Description

What is RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

What is Kafka?

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

What is ActiveMQ?

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

Pros

Why do developers choose RabbitMQ?
  • Why do you like RabbitMQ?

    Why do developers choose Kafka?
  • Why do you like Kafka?

    Why do developers choose ActiveMQ?
    Why do you like ActiveMQ?

    Cons

    What are the cons of using RabbitMQ?
    Downsides of RabbitMQ?

    What are the cons of using Kafka?
    Downsides of Kafka?

    What are the cons of using ActiveMQ?
    No Cons submitted yet for ActiveMQ
    Downsides of ActiveMQ?

    Why do developers choose RabbitMQ vs Kafka vs ActiveMQ?

    • Users of RabbitMQ say it’s fast, easy to configure, and intuitive.
    • Fans of Kafka cite its scalability, high performance, and high-throughput abilities.
    • ActiveMQ users call it efficient and easy to use, and celebrate its open source roots.

    Companies

    What companies use RabbitMQ?
    785 companies on StackShare use RabbitMQ
    What companies use Kafka?
    366 companies on StackShare use Kafka
    What companies use ActiveMQ?
    29 companies on StackShare use ActiveMQ

    Integrations

    What tools integrate with RabbitMQ?
    14 tools on StackShare integrate with RabbitMQ
    What tools integrate with Kafka?
    24 tools on StackShare integrate with Kafka
    What tools integrate with ActiveMQ?
    4 tools on StackShare integrate with ActiveMQ

    What are some alternatives to RabbitMQ, Kafka, and ActiveMQ?

    • Amazon SQS - Fully managed message queuing service
    • Celery - Distributed task queue
    • ZeroMQ - Fast, lightweight messaging library that allows you to design complex communication system without much effort
    • NSQ - A realtime distributed messaging platform

    See all alternatives to RabbitMQ

    Latest News

    Spring Messaging Projects Maintenance Releases - Int...
    Containerizing a Data Ingest Pipeline: Making the JV...
    Kafka Streams on Heroku


    Interest Over Time


    Get help choosing one of these