StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Error Tracking
  4. Mobile Error Monitoring
  5. Crashlytics vs Datadog

Crashlytics vs Datadog

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Crashlytics
Crashlytics
Stacks1.0K
Followers614
Votes340
Datadog
Datadog
Stacks9.8K
Followers8.2K
Votes861

Crashlytics vs Datadog: What are the differences?

Introduction

Crashlytics and Datadog are both popular tools used in application monitoring and error tracking. While they share similarities in terms of their core functionalities, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will highlight six specific differences between Crashlytics and Datadog.

  1. Integration Scope: Crashlytics primarily focuses on Crash Reporting, providing detailed crash reports and analytics for debugging purposes. On the other hand, Datadog offers a broader range of services, including but not limited to log management, infrastructure monitoring, APM (Application Performance Monitoring), and error tracking. Hence, Datadog provides a more holistic approach to application monitoring.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: Crashlytics, as a product of Firebase, is designed specifically for mobile app development and integrates seamlessly with Firebase's suite of tools. In contrast, Datadog is platform-agnostic and can be deployed across various environments, including cloud platforms, on-premises systems, and hybrid infrastructures. This flexibility allows Datadog to cater to a wider range of use cases.

  3. Customization Capabilities: Crashlytics provides limited customization options, mainly focused on adapting the crash reporting interface to match the app's branding. However, Datadog offers a high level of customization, enabling users to configure dashboards, alerts, and other monitoring aspects to suit their specific needs. This level of flexibility helps in tailoring the monitoring experience to the unique requirements of each application.

  4. Third-Party Integrations: While both Crashlytics and Datadog support various integrations, Crashlytics offers a more limited set of third-party integrations compared to Datadog. Datadog boasts an extensive catalog of integrations with popular tools and services, allowing users to consolidate their monitoring and error tracking data in one centralized platform.

  5. Pricing Model: Crashlytics operates on a Freemium model, providing basic crash reporting features for free, with additional advanced functionalities available on paid plans. In contrast, Datadog follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay based on the volume of data ingested and the features utilized. This pricing model offers more flexibility and scalability for users with varying monitoring requirements.

  6. Scalability and Performance: While both Crashlytics and Datadog can handle high volumes of data, Datadog's infrastructure is specifically designed to scale horizontally to accommodate large-scale enterprise needs. This scalability, combined with Datadog's distributed architecture, ensures optimal performance even with a vast amount of data being processed and analyzed.

In summary, Crashlytics is a specialized crash reporting tool with a focus on mobile app development, offering limited customization and integrations. Datadog, on the other hand, provides a broader range of monitoring services across multiple platforms, with extensive customization options, integrations, and scalable performance capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Crashlytics, Datadog

Farzeem Diamond
Farzeem Diamond

Software Engineer at IVP

Jul 21, 2020

Needs adviceonDatadogDatadogDynatraceDynatraceAppDynamicsAppDynamics

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

1.59M views1.59M
Comments
Medeti
Medeti

Jun 27, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon EKSAmazon EKSKubernetesKubernetesAWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

1.51M views1.51M
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 17, 2019

Decided

I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).

The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight

NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon

457k views457k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Crashlytics
Crashlytics
Datadog
Datadog

Instead of just showing you the stack trace, Crashlytics performs deep analysis of each and every thread. We de-prioritize lines that don't matter while highlighting the interesting ones. This makes reading stack traces easier, faster, and far more useful! Crashlytics' intelligent grouping can take 50,000 crashes, distill them down to 20 unique issues, and then tell you which 3 are the most important to fix.

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Instead of just showing you the stack trace, Crashlytics performs deep analysis of each and every thread. We de-prioritize lines that don't matter while highlighting the interesting ones. This makes reading stack traces easier, faster, and far more useful!;Crashlytics' intelligent grouping can take 50,000 crashes, distill them down to 20 unique issues, and then tell you which 3 are the most important to fix.;Now you'll get precise information on the performance of the devices that your apps run on. We'll let you know if the crash only happens on a specific model or generation of a device. We'll even tell you other information, like whether your app only crashes in landscape mode, or whether the proximity sensor is always on.;Through our smart reports, we'll provide key insights into your data so you can spend more time fixing and less time triaging.;Going one layer deeper, Crashlytics examines the operating system that your app is running on. We answer questions like: is it crashing only on jailbroken devices? Is this a memory issue? Does this only affect a specific version of iOS? Through our interactive reports, you'll know instantly.;Our cutting edge architecture can handle all the traffic you'll throw at us. For example, suppose a buggy update is released and all your users experience issues across all of their devices. Our system processes every crash in a record-breaking 18 milliseconds so you can take action — immediately.;Each crash we receive gets analyzed by our banks of servers. While pasting a stack trace is the simplest way to get it to you, we wanted to do better. We analyze the entire stack trace, for every crash, and apply carefully-tuned algorithms. Some lines are de-emphasized while others are highlighted, so we can take you straight to the threads and stack-frames that matter.;We've built a layer of intelligent post-processing to alert you to new issues in real-time. We've also built the channels to get that intelligence to you. Whether you're on the Crashlytics dashboard on your iPad, coding on your MacBook with Crashlytics for Mac, watching your third-party issue tracker or even your email inbox, you'll get notified when something important happens.;You're always in control — all notifications are customizable to minimize noise and maximize action.;The Crashlytics SDK uses a multi-step symbolication process to provide progressively higher levels of detail. We start with on-device symbolication. Once a crash report makes it into our system, stack frames are then re-processed against your application's dSYM on our servers. This two-step symbolication process, coupled with our advanced aggregation algorithms, provides the highest information fidelity available.;On average, Crashlytics adds only 40 KB — or the size of a single image — to the weight of your application.;We don't require linking against any additional frameworks or libraries.;When initialized at start-up, Crashlytics performs only the minimal amount of required work and defers the rest until a few seconds after app startup completes. This delay is configurable — we want your app to launch as quickly as possible;Our memory footprint has been carefully tuned to minimize overhead. We guarantee Crashlytics will not impact gameplay, video processing, or any memory-intensive operations you perform.;We care tremendously about the stability of your app and the experience for your users. If for any reason our SDK fails, its defensive design will ensure it has no negative impact.;We use run-time feature detection to ensure compatibility with iOS 4 to iOS 6 and beyond.
14-day Free Trial for an unlimited number of hosts;200+ turn-key integrations for data aggregation;Clean graphs of StatsD and other integrations;Slice and dice graphs and alerts by tags, roles, and more;Easy-to-use search for hosts, metrics, and tags;Alert notifications via e-mail and PagerDuty;Receive alerts on any metric, for a single host or an entire cluster;Full API access in more than 15 languages;Overlay metrics and events across disparate sources;Out-of-the-box and customizable monitoring dashboards;Easy way to compute rates, ratios, averages, or integrals;Sampling intervals of 10 seconds;Mute all alerts with 1 click during upgrades and maintenance;Tools for team collaboration
Statistics
Stacks
1.0K
Stacks
9.8K
Followers
614
Followers
8.2K
Votes
340
Votes
861
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 78
    Crash tracking
  • 56
    Mobile exception tracking
  • 53
    Free
  • 37
    Easy deployment
  • 25
    Ios
Pros
  • 140
    Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)
  • 107
    Easy setup
  • 87
    Powerful ui
  • 84
    Powerful integrations
  • 70
    Great value
Cons
  • 20
    Expensive
  • 4
    No errors exception tracking
  • 2
    External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging
  • 1
    Complicated
Integrations
Jira
Jira
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Asana
Asana
HipChat
HipChat
Campfire
Campfire
Trello
Trello
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Hall
Hall
NGINX
NGINX
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Java
Java
Docker
Docker
Pingdom
Pingdom
MySQL
MySQL
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
Memcached
Memcached

What are some alternatives to Crashlytics, Datadog?

New Relic

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Instabug

Instabug

Instabug is a platform for Real-Time Contextual Insights that completely takes care of your bug reporting and user feedback process; to accelerate your workflow and allow you to release with confidence.

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Stackify

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Skylight

Skylight

Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.

Librato

Librato

Librato provides a complete solution for monitoring and understanding the metrics that impact your business at all levels of the stack. We provide everything you need to visualize, analyze, and actively alert on the metrics that matter to you.

Keymetrics

Keymetrics

PM2 is a production process manager for Node.js applications with a built-in load balancer. It allows you to keep applications alive forever, to reload them without downtime and to facilitate common system admin tasks.

Dynatrace

Dynatrace

It is an AI-powered, full stack, automated performance management solution. It provides user experience analysis that identifies and resolves application performance issues faster than ever before.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana