StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Performance Monitoring
  4. Performance Monitoring
  5. New Relic vs Uptime Robot

New Relic vs Uptime Robot

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

New Relic
New Relic
Stacks22.7K
Followers8.7K
Votes1.9K
UptimeRobot
UptimeRobot
Stacks325
Followers249
Votes84

New Relic vs Uptime Robot: What are the differences?

Introduction: New Relic and Uptime Robot are two popular monitoring tools used by organizations to track the performance and availability of their online services. Despite serving a similar purpose, these tools have distinct differences that make them suitable for different use cases.

1. Pricing Model: New Relic offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of hosts and the features required, while Uptime Robot provides a straightforward pricing structure with a limited number of monitors for free users and additional monitors available for purchase. This makes New Relic more suitable for larger organizations with complex monitoring needs, while Uptime Robot is ideal for smaller businesses looking for a cost-effective solution.

2. Monitoring Capabilities: New Relic is known for its comprehensive application performance monitoring (APM) capabilities, allowing users to track various metrics related to the performance of their applications. On the other hand, Uptime Robot focuses primarily on website monitoring, checking for uptime and performance issues at regular intervals. Organizations that prioritize application performance may find New Relic more suitable, while those focusing on website uptime may prefer Uptime Robot.

3. Alerting Options: Both New Relic and Uptime Robot offer alerting mechanisms to notify users of any performance or availability issues detected. However, New Relic provides more advanced alerting options, such as customizable thresholds and alert channels, making it easier for users to manage alerts based on their specific requirements. Uptime Robot, while effective in alerting users of downtime, may not offer the same level of customization in alert settings.

4. Integration Support: New Relic offers extensive integration support with various third-party tools and services, allowing users to centralize their monitoring data and streamline their operations. Uptime Robot also provides integration options, but they may be more limited compared to New Relic. Organizations looking to integrate their monitoring tool with other systems may find New Relic more suitable for their needs.

5. Reporting Features: New Relic provides robust reporting features, allowing users to generate detailed reports on performance metrics, trends, and anomalies over time. In contrast, Uptime Robot may offer more basic reporting capabilities, focusing primarily on uptime and downtime reports. Organizations requiring in-depth performance analysis may prefer New Relic for its advanced reporting features.

6. Scalability: New Relic is designed to scale effectively with the growth of an organization, accommodating a larger number of hosts and monitoring requirements. Uptime Robot, while suitable for smaller-scale monitoring needs, may face limitations when it comes to scaling up to meet the demands of a growing business. Organizations planning for future expansion may opt for New Relic for its scalability capabilities.

In Summary, New Relic and Uptime Robot differ in their pricing models, monitoring capabilities, alerting options, integration support, reporting features, and scalability, making them suitable for different use cases based on organizational needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on New Relic, UptimeRobot

Medeti
Medeti

Jun 27, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon EKSAmazon EKSKubernetesKubernetesAWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

1.51M views1.51M
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 17, 2019

Decided

I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).

The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight

NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon

457k views457k
Comments
Attila
Attila

Founder at artkonekt

Mar 24, 2020

Decided

I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.

In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.

The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:

  • The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
  • The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
  • The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
  • The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
  • The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.

Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.

471k views471k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

New Relic
New Relic
UptimeRobot
UptimeRobot

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

It is all about helping you to keep your websites up. It monitors your websites every 5 minutes and alerts you if your sites are down.

Performance Data Retention;Real-User Response Time, Throughput, & Breakdown by Layer;App Response Time, Throughput, & Breakdown by Component;App Availability Monitoring, Alerting, and Notification;Automatic Application Topology Mapping;Server Resource and Availability Monitoring;Error Detection, Alerting, & Analysis;JVM Performance Analyzer;Database Call Response Time & Throughput;Performance Data API Access;Code Level Diagnostics, Transaction Tracing, & Stack Trace Details;Slow SQL and SQL Performance Details;Real-User Breakdown by Web Page, Browser, & Geography;Track Individual Key Transactions;Mobile Features- Alerting, Summary Data, Overview Page, Topo Map, HTTP Requests, HTTP Error Summary, HTTP Error Detail, Versions, Carriers, Devices, Geo Map
Event tree analysis; Support for Let's Encrypt; Public Status Page; SMS Reminders; Uptime Monitoring; User Profiles with Location
Statistics
Stacks
22.7K
Stacks
325
Followers
8.7K
Followers
249
Votes
1.9K
Votes
84
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 414
    Easy setup
  • 344
    Really powerful
  • 245
    Awesome visualization
  • 194
    Ease of use
  • 151
    Great ui
Cons
  • 20
    Pricing model doesn't suit microservices
  • 10
    UI isn't great
  • 7
    Visualizations aren't very helpful
  • 7
    Expensive
  • 5
    Hard to understand why things in your app are breaking
Pros
  • 22
    Free tier
  • 18
    Easy to understand
  • 14
    Instant notifications
  • 8
    Simpler than Pingdom
  • 5
    Cheap but Reliable
Cons
  • 4
    False-Positives
  • 3
    Consistently bad UI
  • 2
    Confusing UI
  • 0
    Extremely bad UI experience
Integrations
AppHarbor
AppHarbor
Cloudability
Cloudability
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute
cloudControl
cloudControl
Papertrail
Papertrail
Loggly
Loggly
Ducksboard
Ducksboard
Blitz
Blitz
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Slack
Slack
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Telegram
Telegram
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
VictorOps
VictorOps
OpsGenie
OpsGenie

What are some alternatives to New Relic, UptimeRobot?

Datadog

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Pingdom

Pingdom

Pingdom is an uptime monitoring service. When problems happen with a site that Pingdom monitors, it immediately alerts the owner so the problem can be taken care of.

Better Stack

Better Stack

Better Stack is a radically better infrastructure monitoring platform that calls the right person on your team if anything goes wrong. Schedule on-call duties, receive helpful alerts, and collaborate on solving incidents faster than ever.

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

StatusCake

StatusCake

Monitoring a website is one thing – finding the best way to alert you to downtime another. At StatusCake we give you as many options as possible to decide when & how often you’re contacted. Whether it’s by email, SMS, push notifications for iOS & Android or integration with third party apps including Zapier and PagerDuty – you decide how you want to be alerted and when!

Stackify

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Skylight

Skylight

Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.

updown.io

updown.io

updown is an online service that checks your website's status by periodically sending an HTTP HEAD request to the URL of your choice. It then notifies you by email or sms when your website is not responding correctly.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana