StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Docker vs GitHub

Docker vs GitHub

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.6K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Docker
Docker
Stacks194.2K
Followers143.8K
Votes3.9K

Docker vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Docker is an open-source platform that enables developers to automate the deployment and scaling of applications using containerization, while GitHub is a web-based hosting service that provides version control and collaboration tools for developers. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Usage: Docker is primarily used for packaging and deploying applications into containers, allowing for easy portability and replication of software environments. On the other hand, GitHub is used for version control, code collaboration, and hosting repositories, enabling developers to store and manage their source code projects.

  2. Functionality: Docker focuses on containerization, which provides lightweight and isolated environments for applications. It allows developers to package all the dependencies and configurations required by their applications into a single container, making them easy to deploy across different environments. In contrast, GitHub primarily offers version control functionality, allowing developers to track changes to their code, collaborate with others, and maintain a history of revisions.

  3. Deployment: Docker enables the seamless deployment of applications across different environments, including local development machines, on-premises servers, and cloud platforms. With Docker, developers can ensure that their applications run consistently regardless of the underlying infrastructure. GitHub, on the other hand, is not designed for deployment but rather for hosting and managing code repositories. It provides developers with a centralized platform for sharing their code and collaborating with others.

  4. Collaboration: GitHub offers a comprehensive set of collaboration tools, such as pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking, which facilitate collaboration among developers working on the same codebase. It enables teams to work together efficiently and ensures that changes to the code are reviewed and approved before being merged. Docker, on the other hand, does not provide built-in collaboration features. It focuses more on the packaging and deployment aspects of applications.

  5. Community Support: Docker has a large and active community that contributes to its ecosystem. It offers a wide range of pre-built container images available on the Docker Hub, which developers can use as a starting point for their applications. GitHub also has a vibrant developer community and provides a platform for collaboration and knowledge sharing through its repository hosting and social networking features.

  6. Purpose: The main purpose of Docker is to simplify and streamline the deployment of applications, making them more scalable and portable. It helps developers ensure that their applications can run consistently across different environments. GitHub, on the other hand, focuses on version control and collaboration, providing developers with a centralized platform for managing and sharing their code.

In summary, Docker is primarily used for packaging and deploying applications into containers, allowing for easy portability and replication of software environments. GitHub, on the other hand, focuses on version control and collaboration, enabling developers to manage and share their source code projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Docker

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Praveen
Praveen

Engineering Manager at Taylor and Francis

Jul 29, 2019

Needs adviceonMongoDB AtlasMongoDB AtlasJavaJavaSpring BootSpring Boot

We are in the process of building a modern content platform to deliver our content through various channels. We decided to go with Microservices architecture as we wanted scale. Microservice architecture style is an approach to developing an application as a suite of small independently deployable services built around specific business capabilities. You can gain modularity, extensive parallelism and cost-effective scaling by deploying services across many distributed servers. Microservices modularity facilitates independent updates/deployments, and helps to avoid single point of failure, which can help prevent large-scale outages. We also decided to use Event Driven Architecture pattern which is a popular distributed asynchronous architecture pattern used to produce highly scalable applications. The event-driven architecture is made up of highly decoupled, single-purpose event processing components that asynchronously receive and process events.

To build our #Backend capabilities we decided to use the following:

  1. @{#Microservices}|topic:513| - @{Java}|tool:995| with @{Spring Boot}|tool:2927| , @{Node.js}|tool:1011| with @{ExpressJS}|tool:1163| and @{Python}|tool:993| with @{Flask}|tool:1001|
  2. @{#Eventsourcingframework}|topic:890| - @{Amazon Kinesis}|tool:433| , @{Amazon Kinesis Firehose}|tool:3770| , @{Amazon SNS}|tool:396| , @{Amazon SQS}|tool:395|, @{AWS Lambda}|tool:1909|
  3. @{#Data}|topic:1360| - @{Amazon RDS}|tool:232| , @{Amazon DynamoDB}|tool:389| , @{Amazon S3}|tool:25| , @{MongoDB Atlas}|tool:5739|

To build #Webapps we decided to use Angular with RxJS

#Devops - GitHub , Travis CI , Terraform , Docker , Serverless

4.12M views4.12M
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion
Statistics
Stacks
295.6K
Stacks
194.2K
Followers
259.0K
Followers
143.8K
Votes
10.4K
Votes
3.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Java
Java
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Linux
Linux
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
boot2docker
boot2docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Vagrant
Vagrant

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Docker?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana