StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs GitHub Enterprise

GitHub vs GitHub Enterprise

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.6K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10

GitHub vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

GitHub and GitHub Enterprise are used for version control and collaborative software development. To better understand their distinctions, let's explore the key differences between GitHub, a cloud-based offering, and GitHub Enterprise, a self-hosted solution:

  1. Deployment and Infrastructure: GitHub is a cloud-hosted platform where users can create repositories, collaborate, and access a range of features without managing infrastructure. In contrast, GitHub Enterprise allows organizations to deploy and maintain their own instance of GitHub on their private infrastructure. This self-hosted approach provides greater control and security over the development environment.

  2. Scalability and User Limits: GitHub imposes certain limitations on the number of collaborators, repositories, and storage capacity based on the subscription plan. These limits may differ across plans, such as free, pro, or team. Conversely, GitHub Enterprise offers scalability that aligns with an organization's needs. It enables users to adjust the platform's capacity to accommodate a larger number of users, repositories, and data storage, making it suitable for enterprises and growing teams.

  3. Security and Compliance: While GitHub ensures robust security measures for its cloud-based platform, organizations with strict security and compliance requirements may opt for GitHub Enterprise. With GitHub Enterprise, organizations can maintain their infrastructure and implement additional security measures to meet specific regulatory or compliance standards, ensuring data privacy and control.

  4. Integration and Customization: GitHub provides integrations with various development tools and services to enhance workflows and collaboration. However, customization options are limited to the platform's features and configurations. In contrast, GitHub Enterprise allows organizations to customize the platform extensively. They can integrate it with their existing development ecosystem, incorporate custom functionality, and tailor the user experience to their specific requirements.

  5. Support and Service Level Agreements (SLAs): GitHub provides assistance to users through channels such as documentation, community forums, and ticket-based support, with the level of support offered depending on the chosen subscription plan. For enterprise customers, GitHub Enterprise offers additional support choices and service level agreements (SLAs). These SLAs guarantee quicker response times, priority support, and dedicated assistance to resolve critical issues or meet specific requirements.

In summary, GitHub is a cloud-based platform that provides a user-friendly environment for version control and collaboration. It offers scalability, integration options, and streamlined workflows. GitHub Enterprise, as a self-hosted solution, provides organizations with greater control, scalability, customization capabilities, and dedicated support. It caters to enterprises seeking enhanced security, compliance, and the flexibility to tailor GitHub to their specific needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, GitHub Enterprise

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
Stacks
295.6K
Stacks
500
Followers
259.0K
Followers
627
Votes
10.4K
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1774
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 2
    Code security
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to GitHub, GitHub Enterprise?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana